JETS 23:2 (June 1980) p. 112 As the reader can plainly see, the problem with understanding Arno C. Gaebelein is a problem of semantics and of a total view of the man. Both, I believe, are related to a lack of in-depth research. It is appalling to me that neither Timothy Weber, Dwight Wilson nor any of the other authors took time to ask Frank E. Gaebelein, Arno C. Gaebelein’s son, or E. Schuyler English about Gaebelein’s attitudes. Frank Gaebelein, a respected educator and keen scholar, would have